The anthropocentrist considers the theocentric fanatic

VIEW:411 DATA:2020-03-20

In the anthropocentric system, man must work for man, and in the theocentric system, man must work for God, the anthropocentrist considers that working for God is fanaticism. So different codes generate different fanatical concepts.

For an anthropocentrist Jesus is considered a fanatic. For he considers fanaticism the idea that a God determines that someone decides to seek the path of death in order to obey a God that determines this need. Therefore, for the anthropocentrist, the idea that God asks for the death of man, whatever the cause, is considered fanaticism by the anthropocentrist.

But if man fights for an anthropocentric ideal, the act of dying for that ideal is not considered fanaticism for the anthropocentric, on the contrary it is considered praiseworthy, and worthy of being considered a hero.  

Fanaticism using the same theocentric system

There is also the existence of fanaticism in the same code, that is, in a community that is said to follow theocentrism, one considers the other fanatic. So that we can determine who is a fanatic or not, we must analyze the code to find out if the individual considered a fanatic added something to the code that did not exist.

Example for fanaticism analysis

Using the Bible code as an idea of ​​fanaticism or not, we can do some practical analysis.

Suppose, for example, that a man considers it his duty both in public and private worship, to prostrate himself to pray. We would have, for example, people who say they follow the same code as the Bible, condemning such an act of fanaticism. To determine whether such an act is fanaticism or not, we would therefore have to examine the Bible code to determine whether or not it is fanaticism.

For example, taking the Hebrew word for prayer, we must determine its primordial idea by the etymology of the word, that is, we must idealize the idea of ​​the word prayer by those who created the word.

Searching in dictionaries the etymology of the Hebrew word prayer, we would have that etymologically the word prayer comes from the idea of ​​falling, the idea of ​​taking judgment, and taking care. So etymologically, prayer should idealize the act of prostrating, the act of taking something to trial, and taking care of what you are going to do. Right from the etymological principle, the foundation that prayer is prostrate is not fanaticism.

But we still have analyzes of exegesis and hermeneutics. For example, if a man is in chains he will be able to pray if he is unable to fall down?

The trap of hermeneutics

Hermeneutics seeks the idea of ​​understanding the idea of ​​the text. But there is a big trap. The anthropocentric concept considers fanaticism theocentric concepts. Therefore, if we use anthropocentric concepts in hermeneutics guiding the theocentric, we will soon have an anthropocentric interpretation of a theocentric concept. The correct hermeneutics is to use only theocentric idealisms in theocentric concepts. Hermeneutics is the great trap of theocentric interpretation, as it seeks anthropocentric idealisms in theocentric concepts, forming a servant theocentrism of anthropocentism, so that man determines the rules for God and not God determines the rules for man.

Thus theocentrism ends up being a figurative name for anthropocentrism, in which the idea of ​​man dictates the mentality of God.

So the text must be analyzed, by the text, and not the text by what man thinks is correct. It must be clearly determined which are the beacons of a system and leave fixed concepts of analysis, when an analysis links possibilities such factors cannot be considered in a theocentric system. Because of only one factor, the theocentric involves the outside and not the inside of man. Anthropocentric involves man's will, theocentric involves another will. So the analysis has to be linked to the outside and not to the inside. An example, if God exists he created the universe, if the law of gravity exists then God made it so. This line of thinking demonstrates factors that must be analyzed from the outside, not from the inside. 

FACEBOOK

Participe de nossa rede facebook.com/osreformadoresdasaude

Novidades, e respostas das perguntas de nossos colaboradores