The anthropocentric truth
The great human aspect is that man defines what is true and what is false. Hence the term anthropocentric. But that leads to several factors.
Imagine that man defines a truth, for example.
- Nature should be explored as it pleases mankind.
This is a typical anthropocentric ideology. Imagine that man uses nature and the earth collapses and nature causes disasters that kill large numbers of men, forming another truth.
- Nature must be conserved.
We could ask some questions.
First, is the truth variable?
Now if the truth were variable, then the action of the first truth would cause differences in the regions in which the exploration of nature occurred. But if nature is devastated, the consequence is the same, so the natural truth remains, but the human one changes.
Second is the truth defined by man?
If the truth were defined by man, the truth of nature would be obliged to obey the truth of man, so if man determined that nature could not end, even if man exploited it, the truth of nature would be subjugated to the truth of man, but what happens is the opposite, if man determines a truth different from natural truth, the truth of man will be destroyed before the truth of nature.
Third, does man want to impose a truth different from the truth?
Therefore, the truth of man is variable, because man tries to impose a truth different from the truth, because if the truth of man were the truth it would not change, since in history when man imposes a truth different from the natural, he has to change its truth, but the truth of nature does not change.
So the anthropocentric truth is nothing more than the imaginary, egocentric idealization of a pseudo-truth that is in accordance with your interests.
