People wonder if GPT Chat will be good or bad. The correct question would be "for who?"The GPT Chat system is an artificial intelligence system, composed of several algorithms, which follow rules generated by the programmer. And beyond these rules, the system is politically correct.
What is politically correct?
It is a mechanism in which the groups that determine what is correct, impose it on others simply by their own ideals.
The act of questioning any of these points implies a repressive response and punitive.
Así, the thought begins to be linked to the dominant systems, and what does not fit into the dominants is extracted from the system.
Policy questions contrary to the state of right will never pass through the system. Therefore, each country, with its political system, will define the limits that the system could have against its own policies. The political systems try to masify the population so that they are never contrary to the State's will.
Así, Chat GPT is a system that makes it easier for men to produce materials or services, and that makes it easier for these men to accept state norms, as a correct and ideal mechanism, generating in each state a population system according to its actions and without a critical vision of las acciones del Estado.
These things occur because the GPT Chat system would be determined to have its positivist inclination and complacent towards the state, but not with the people who receive the punitive laws of the state.
In this way, we will have populations that can prepare themselves to be suitable for the labor market and obedient to the State's organizational systems. Thus, the concept of the government's vision will be disseminated and added to the minds of young people, and thus domesticated in the system of government laws, they will be obedient to the system. No, because one of the current characteristics of the human being is the easiest path. And then, the vast majority of young people will be linked to easier mechanisms. So that you can think less, and finish work faster and receive your livelihood, and live in this way. easy. While many idealists have always accepted the most difficult, or most dangerous, path to modify dominant norms, which limited them as thinkers.
Currently, as in the past, the act of thinking has its limits, depending on how To think, the dominant concept tends to generate punitive tools, as in the Media Age. But then, are there no bad thoughts? Yes, there are, but when the thought generates a punitive effect against the thought, the thought becomes nullified. A thought must be uprooted by another thought, not by a punitive action. Therefore, if 2 plus 2 is not four, then someone else must prove that it is not 4. And not punish those who define 2 plus 2 as four. for ideas, and not for the repression of them. But currently, ideas that do not fit into the "status quo" are repressed by punitive actions. Which takes us to the repressive mechanism for ideas. And only liberate the ideas that the dominant groups accept that exist.
In some cases, the actions of the dominant religion of the Media Age are questioned, which are against the dominant religion, and the same things are repressed with punitive actions . And they considered that those who were punished were really mistaken, in the same way that currently those who are punished for their ideas also have their thoughts repressed.
And all these things will be linked to the massification of GPT chats, so that the dominant laws do not prohibit them from working, because they have fundamentals contrary to the dominant political system, They will be sanctioned, and their systems erased, and even destroyed. In general, those who accept punishment for acts of thought are clearly linked to the system of repression of ideas. Because in the game of ideas we must use ideas and not punitive and repressive forces. The punitive and repressive forces must come from other repressive and punitive acts, not from ideas.
