Imagine that a person finds a watch, is it possible to prove scientifically that it was built by an intelligent person?
According to some scientists, it is not possible to determine that the watch was created by an intelligent individual, using scientific methods.
For some scientists it is necessary to find the individual who made the watch and put it in a battery of laboratory tests to define that the watch was made by an intelligent being.
But if it is only possible to determine intelligence when the individual is placed in the laboratory, then what is the use of hundreds of radio telescopes trying to search for intelligent beings by means of radio waves?
That is, to say that the intelligent designer is philosophy, it would be the same thing as a radio telescope directed at a planet thousands of light years away, and that radio telescope captures a story of a great alien culture, and this is not scientific proof of that there is intelligent life in that direction.
Thus, radio telescopes are not scientifically capable of detecting intelligent life outside the planet. Even if it captures an alien novel, since according to some scientists, it is impossible to have a scientific basis without putting the aliens in the laboratory.
In fact, all of these things are merely the will of some scientists, not wanting the subject to be included in the scientific concept.
It is typical dictatorialism, not the logical concept. The intelligent designer is not a philosophical concept, it is a scientific concept, in which objects in a complex way can be determined or not by an intelligent mind.
Scientifically, we can prove that a watch is a creation of an intelligent being, even if we do not detect that individual. This is science not philosophy.