Currently, learning is developing, linked to relaxation. So one must learn by relaxing. Relaxation is defined in the dictionary as a state of being relaxed, ie relaxed. The state of relaxation can be a good effect for assimilating information, but a bad one for logical thinking, and for questioning science.
Every problem generates tension, to achieve its solution. Learning that is linked to relaxation, does not generate tension for resolution. Because it assumes that the resolution is easily achieved. But real life is not like that. Educating in the relaxation system, for adult activities, the person is unable to act under the pressure of life, does not train people who develop new mechanisms, and create more optimized systems.
Generating an education, with decentralized knowledge, forms a system so decentralized that it does not reach a solution. And so a paradox is usually reached. While teaching the variability of positions, so that people at school have different opinions. When testing for jobs, or knowledge, question systems with alternatives are used.
And therein lies the question of the position taught. Is there truth, or is truth relative? An individual who has learned that the truth is relative, then cannot accept a question of alternatives.
So the big social error in education is the hypocrisy of learning. Defining one type of learning, and charging another type.
But is the truth really relative? To answer this question in a simple way, just understand that if a miscalculation occurs, for example in a spaceship, it simply explodes, killing its crew. The answer to the question for those who live in the real world is that the truth is not relative. The question involves whether people want to accept the truth or not. No matter how much I wish that something is not real, if it is real, I have to accept and learn.
For a long time, countries with negationist governments used their relative truths, generating death and destruction, as they did not seek the absolute truth defined in science. Developing methodologies, of relative truth, for society, only encourages more negationist, because they accept that the relative truth is an absolute truth. What in itself is irrational.
What has been seen is that the teaching of relative truth, in educational groups, has forged the current denialists.
Every problem generates tension, to achieve its solution. Learning that is linked to relaxation, does not generate tension for resolution. Because it assumes that the resolution is easily achieved. But real life is not like that. Educating in the relaxation system, for adult activities, the person is unable to act under the pressure of life, does not train people who develop new mechanisms, and create more optimized systems.
Generating an education, with decentralized knowledge, forms a system so decentralized that it does not reach a solution. And so a paradox is usually reached. While teaching the variability of positions, so that people at school have different opinions. When testing for jobs, or knowledge, question systems with alternatives are used.
And therein lies the question of the position taught. Is there truth, or is truth relative? An individual who has learned that the truth is relative, then cannot accept a question of alternatives.
So the big social error in education is the hypocrisy of learning. Defining one type of learning, and charging another type.
But is the truth really relative? To answer this question in a simple way, just understand that if a miscalculation occurs, for example in a spaceship, it simply explodes, killing its crew. The answer to the question for those who live in the real world is that the truth is not relative. The question involves whether people want to accept the truth or not. No matter how much I wish that something is not real, if it is real, I have to accept and learn.
For a long time, countries with negationist governments used their relative truths, generating death and destruction, as they did not seek the absolute truth defined in science. Developing methodologies, of relative truth, for society, only encourages more negationist, because they accept that the relative truth is an absolute truth. What in itself is irrational.
What has been seen is that the teaching of relative truth, in educational groups, has forged the current denialists.