Let's say the world stays the way it is. Will he destroy himself or not?
The way the world is, if it remains, it will be destroyed, both by the actions of war, and confrontation, as by the actions of destruction of nature.
In the world, we have the majority, in the concept of response to height. What would that be? It would be the old-fashioned "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" law. So we have that most people and even laws are bound by this code of Hammurabi.
But does this code work? If this code worked, we'd be in paradise, but that's not true. We are every day with social, economic, psychological and natural problems.
Many thinkers showed the norms for man to rise, among them we can have the thoughts of Jesus Christ, those of Gandhi, Mother Teresa of Calcutta, and many other pacifists.
While pacifists dictate that care and love be the link to reduce evil. The majority of the world's population determines revenge.
Revenge is notably the action of doing to the other what the other has done. And that is nothing more than becoming similar to the other.
In the world we have a total breakdown of the education system, in which children are treated as masses and placed in schools, while parents are busy turning capitalism around.
Massified children do not learn correctly to be people, because people must be educated by people in an individualistic way, and not massified. A father and mother raise a child, step by step. That would be the natural rule.
Placing 30 to 40 children, managed by one or two teachers, in a sitting room is not an educational system, for the real construction of an individual.
As the term says, individual, a unique being, which according to nature has a meiotic parent with sperm, and another meiotic parent with an egg, forming a zygote.
These two parents have the biological mission of educating the child to adulthood. An individualized upbringing, satisfying the knowledge that neither parent is getting anything for it, and that they are doing these things out of love for the growing individual.
But we put people who earn to do something out of love, and in this case the concept of binding love is linked to the money, which teachers, principals, and other caring individuals earn.
In relation to parents, real and affective education is linked to what is done for love and not for profit.
In fact, the capitalist system generates the concept of money so important that social relations lose meaning, to the detriment of the concept of capital.
Thus, the future of the planet is destruction by the unbridled struggle of capital, generating all kinds of destruction possible.
education, parent, individualized education, individualized education, future of the planet, destruction of the planet, education system, capitalism
