The Hebrew language originates from ancient Semitic, so Hebrew adapted to Aramaic does not have a basis of originality, that is, it is a mixture of other languages.
The writing can be defined as proto-Sinaitic, it is similar to the Phoenician alphabet, and the Semitic languages are interconnected. Even the Mesopotamians wrote in cuneiform, which does not define syllabic systems, but the speech of the Mesopotamians is linked to the Semitic, in this way the Hebrew speech is a mixture and a mutation of different forms over time.
Thus, we can think of the following path: the Hebrew language emerged through the speech of Ur of the Chaldees, then there was a mixture between the Phoenicians and the ancient Canaanites, then it mixed with Egyptian, then with the Sinaitic dialect. After that, the Hebrew people remained in a region for a long time and were taken to the Babylonian kingdom. Once again, they came into contact with a variation of Semitic, and their speech was slightly altered. After that, they were captured by the Assyrians, and at this point the greatest documented variation of the Hebrew writing and language occurred, mixing with Aramaic. They returned to the region of the Jordan River and later came under Roman rule.
The Romans destroy Jerusalem, and the Hebrew diaspora occurs. With the relocation of the Hebrews to other countries, the Hebrew language was considered dead.
This gave rise to Hebrew dialects, such as Yiddish, which diversified between Germanic, Slavic, Russian and Semitic. European Hebrews are defined as Ashkenazi or Ashkenazim, while those of Arab descent are called Sephardim.
With Hebrew, Aramaic and Yiddish, and the creation of the State of Israel, the aim was to build a Hebrew language, with the foundations of the great Jewish families.
What is the meaning of all this? This means that it is not possible under any circumstances to define what the Hebrews say today as the same as what Moses said on Sinai, or even as Abraham spoke. In this way, the great debates about how the name of God is pronounced completely lose their meaning, since there is no basis whatsoever for knowing the phonetics of extremely ancient peoples. What we have today are merely phonetic assumptions, based on the ideologies of each linguistic archaeologist.
